A Voice in the Wilderness
site navigation
free newsletter
|
" Just a 'Little' Felony "
"For whoever shall keep the whole Law, and yet stumble in one point, he
is guilty of all." (Ja2:10)
A few months ago there was a story in the news about a store exercising
a "zero-tolerance policy for shoplifting". According to our local TV
coverage of it:
"A Florida man has been arrested and charged with petty theft for eating
10 jelly beans out of a store bin, before he arrived at the checkstand.
Police say the man was caught on camera inside an Albertson's store
pulling jelly beans out of a bin, and eating them. After he paid for the
rest of his groceries, the 34-year-old was confronted by store security,
and asked if the candy was good. He said 'yes,' and was then arrested."
The man's excuse was that he had been a shopper at the store for 30
years and "just wanted to try the candy to see if he should buy it"
[vw: It requires -10- to 'taste-test'?? :]
This TV station regularly has what they call a "Sound-Off" segment where
viewers e-mail their opinions during the broadcast, and selected
comments are then read 'live' during the newscast.
Here is a sampling of the responses they chose to read:
"I heard this story and how petty can a store be? For starters they
just lost all my business for the year. I have zero tolerance for
[expletive] managers."
"What is this world coming to? Arrested for eating 10 jelly beans? That
is the biggest bunch of [expletive] I have ever heard of!"
"I think that Albertson is being very petty about the jelly beans. He
just eat 10 not the whole bin. If that is the way that they want to be,
I guess that my choice would have to be never to shop at Albertson
again."
"Though I do not condone theft or shoplifting, this is going way
overboard to charge someone for eating TEN jellybeans. If that is the
way Albertsons is treating their customers, I will certainly not shop
there again."
"I think arresting a man for eating 10 jellybeans is unconscionable!!
C'mon!! Yes, I've tasted a thing or two in the bins in stores before.
Maybe not TEN jellybeans, but I think most of us or at least many of us
would have to say that some time during our lives we have tried
something from a bin. And he's shopped in the store for 30 years!! Makes
me want to never shop in Albertson's again. There should NEVER be an
arrest for this. Aren't we more civilized than that???"
"You gotta be kidding this multi million dollar corporation can't spare
10 jelly beans. Be careful don't try the grapes you might be looking at
5-10 in the penn."
"They should fire the Albertson's Manager. This is getting ridiculous.
Charge him for the beans and send him on his way. Talk about making a
Mt. out of a Mole Hill!"
"At the very least, he should be made to walk the plank. Plucking ten
jelly beans could mean the downfall of society as we know it. O brother!
Albertson's overreacted, and could have handled this more discreetly."
"What little kid HASN'T done this? That manager is being completely
[expletive]. The guy bought stuff--it's not like he just went in the
store to pilfer."
Notice I said, what the TV station "chose" to read. Later when I went to
the postings at their website, there had been an equal/balanced number
of comments from the other side of the issue, similar to some things
that will be addressed here. But as is the case with the media, there
seems to be an agenda.
My comments, before going on here: If the candy was "good", and he was
"testing", he should have gotten a bag and purchased some. By his own
admission, the candy was "good". And that admission, when he didn't also
buy some, was an admission of his guilt.
But what about this? ...and these comments? What, exactly, is it that
is the "downfall of society"? What is it that this world is "coming
to"? He "-just- ate 10...not the whole bin"? Yeah, and I bought "stuff",
too, last time I went shopping, but when I saw the soap, still in the
cart, that had fallen below that I had somehow missed when putting my
items on the conveyor belt, I reached in, got it, and put it on the
conveyor. I suppose nobody else might have seen it, and I could have
gotten away with it...after all, I was -paying- for everything -else-.
If I were to take the effort now to look up some statistics, but I'm too
lazy at the moment, but I'm sure you've all seen them at some time or
other... the Billions of dollars that businesses lose due to shop
lifting. Of course, they stay in business. But if the business "covers"
the cost of so-called "petty" theft, let's understand one thing clearly:
It is not the store that pays for it; all the other customers do;
because in order to stay in business it is a balancing act: What comes
'in' vs what goes 'out'. If some is going 'out' due to theft, prices
must rise, overall, to cover it. Thus, the person who steals, steals
from all the other shoppers; including you and me. And I'm certainly not
a "multi-million dollar" entity!
But there is this attitude in humanity that seems to say: Whatever I can
get, in whatever way I can get it, I'll take it. If it involves theft,
just don't get caught. Or like in the case when my store's Open/Closed
sign finally broke a few months ago, when a customer's child was pulling
and yanking on it; the parent did not scold the child, but instead
looked me straight in the face without batting an eyelash and observed,
"It was ready to break, anyway." Thus, implying (?), the child did me a
"favor"??? Or... was it thereby -my- 'fault' that her kid broke it?
It was actually -many- kids over the years. Her's, merely, finished its
final total destruction.
When I was younger I remember the signs that might be seen in some
shops, "You broke it? You bought it!"
There was a sense of responsibility and accountability for one's own
actions. But today, if somebody damages something belonging to somebody
else... Well, you have insurance, right? That's what insurance is for.
This even seems to be the attitude of many in law enforcement. You're
the business owner... that's just one of the expenses of doing business.
Today we seem to live in a "no fault" world. A little child does
something wrong: Oh, it's not their fault, they can't help it, they're
so young. When a person gets older: It's not their fault, it is their
parents' fault. The parents: You did the best you could, it's not your
fault... even though you refused to discipline your kids when younger.
Or... it's 'society's' fault; we need to pass more laws to put the
government in charge of this, that or the other thing; and make sure
there are plenty of 'counselors' to go around. And above all, if you
commit an offense, be sure to "forgive yourself"; it's not your fault.
ANYTHING BUT... SELF-ACCOUNTABILITY.
And why is this? What happens? The adult traces back to their
unaccountable childhood. Childhood to parents. Parents to whom? Their
parents? Teachers? Neighbors? Once the blame has been laid back far
enough, generation after generation, where does it end? Where did the
problems all start?
"Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death
through sin, and thus death spread to every person, because everyone
sinned." (Rom5:12)
Adam, and his wife Eve. (Gen3)
And through the birth process, sin has passed on down generation after
generation.
"Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother
conceive me." (Ps51:5)
Aaah! The word people don't like, so they pretend it doesn't exist.
-SIN-
The one person commented: "What little kid hasn't done this?"
Exactly!
"...for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,"
(Rom3:23) "As it is written: There is none righteous, no, not one;"
(Rom3:10)
And so, if -everyone- has done sinful acts (of which 'theft' is one of
them), well then it's kinda hard to accuse or criticize someone for
stealing a few little jelly beans, isn't it. If -he- is to be arrested,
for what infractions should -I- also be arrested?
But you see... if we can adopt the Hippy generation's slogan "Live and
let live, man", well then, I can misbehave, you can misbehave; nobody's
gonna "lay blame". After all, for aaaallll that stuff on the store's
shelves, what's a measly "10 jelly beans"?
But God's Law says, "You shall not steal" (Ex20:15)
And furthermore... supposing those had been -your- jelly beans, that you
had set your mind on to either eat, or give to your kids as a special
treat when you got home, and somebody had stolen them from you? When
you got home and found them missing, how would you feel? Would you not
be upset?
When a person loves God, he is also going to love and respect his
neighbor. "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Mt22:39, Le19:18)
As Jesus expanded on that, "And as you would have men do to you, you
also do likewise to them." (Lk6:31)
When a golfer is putting, the ball goes skimming past the hole just a
half inch away. Everybody gasps... Oh, it was sooooo close! Another
golfer putts and the ball swings way wide by several feet. Who has the
better score? It's like the saying, "Close counts only in horseshoes and
hand grenades" -Both- golfers 'missed' the mark.
It's the same with sin. How big a sin keeps a person out of God's
Heaven? Well... Eve -only- ate -just- a piece of fruit. What was so
"big-a-deal" about that??? It wasn't like she -killed- somebody.
Well... she -DID- "kill" somebody, because: Because of her disobedience,
and she knew the consequences, God had promised "death", the entirety of
humanity that she started giving birth to, was and is born in sin. The
penalty for sin is death. Just from one piece of forbidden fruit?
Indeed! God had said "Don't", but they -did-.
It's not really -about- "jellybeans" is it. It's about right vs wrong,
good vs evil. A hairline crack in a circuit board vs a ripped power
cable? It doesn't matter. The device isn't going to work. Oh,
but....it's such a -tiny- little crack! Nope! Not gonna work. But it was
an aaaaaccident! I didn't mean to... Nope! Still not gonna work.
If a person would steal jellybeans, where would that mentality stop? To
steal somebody's car? To embezzle millions of dollars? They are -all-
the taking of something not belonging to the thief. Perhaps the penalty
for jelly beans is less than that for stealing a car. But nevertheless,
it is wrong.
And... "...flesh and blood is not able to inherit the kingdom of God;
nor does corruption inherit incorruption." (1Co15:50)
There is apparently this hispanic comedian (Carlos Mencia, as told to me
by a neighbor) who makes "hispanic jokes"; he pokes fun at his own
ethnicity. According to him, when a hispanic is trying to belittle their
own criminal past they will whine: "It was just a -little- felony". This
was told to me in the context that, this neighbor is in the business of
renting apartments to lower income people. Part of the application
process includes the question: Do you have a criminal record? And she
was laughing how she discovered that the comedian's jokes are -real-, in
real life. She has interviewed some of Hispanic ethnicity, and when
asked the question about a criminal past, there is a bit of hemming and
hawing, and in a somewhat weak voice: I have a felony, but it was just a
"little" one.
According to the dictionary: "felony" == "One of several -GRAVE- crimes,
such as murder, rape, or burglary, punishable by a more stringent
sentence than that given for a misdemeanor"
As if to say: I only killed the person a "little" bit. I only "sorta"
raped the person. I only broke into "one room" of the house.
So... we'll sentence you to only 15 "short" years, instead of 15 "long"
ones.
According to the dictionary: "sin" == "A transgression of a religious or
moral law, especially when deliberate"
Thing is, whether "deliberate" or not, sin is sin. The ball did -not-
make it into the hole. It missed the mark. God's Law was broken.
God also had sacrifices in the OT for the "uninintentional" sins and
trespasses. (Le5:18, Num15:25) The very fact that we are born, we are
sinners. That first rebellious squall as a baby is because of the sin
nature. Just like dogs bark -because- they are dogs, and ducks quack
-because- they are ducks; sinners sin -because- they are sinners. That's
how they are born.
There is no such thing as a "little felony". There is also no such thing
as a "little sin". A "white lie". A lie is a lie; the opposite of truth;
the opposite of God's essence. Jesus said, "I am the way, the TRUTH..."
(Jn14:6) Any "little" sin, whatever it is, is (as Maxwell Smart used to
say) missing the mark "by THAT much".
Just because society calls "evil good" (Is5:20) does not make it so. If
society were to start proclaiming that gravity doesn't exist, it would
not change the laws of nature; if they trip, they will still fall on
their face. Nor can society's denial of God's existence make it so. They
can argue the meaning of what "is" is; but God still -is-; that is His
name, "Jehovah", the existing one, He -is-.
And Jehovah God Most High has established certain laws. Some of those
laws have to do with how mankind behaves. Even the smallest infraction
(that tiniest microscopic hairline crack) makes the person at variance
with God's holy character (the device malfunctions) and is under
judgment (put on the reject pile).
In electronics there are two possibilities for the faulty part: 1) Fix
it to bring it up to spec and register it with a serial number, or 2)
throw it away.
Same with the sinner.
- 'Fixing' is provided by Jesus Christ, who died on the cross to take
away sin's penalty, and then rose from the dead again to assure Eternal
Life (Rom6:4-11) to which the Holy Spirit "seals" the guarantee.
(Eph1:13-14) Eternal Life is offered as a "gift of God" (Eph2:8) to be
"received" in Jesus (Jn1:12) when the sinner "repents and believes the
Gospel" (Mk1:15)
- 'Throwing away' happens at the Great White throne, where those whose
names are not in the Book of Life (no 'serial number') are thrown into
the Lake of Fire (Rev20:15) where "their worm does not die, nor is their
fire quenched; and they shall be an abhorrence to all flesh." (Is66:24b)
Amen!
|